Save the Rail Petition

Save The Rail brochure

View the brochure

Urgent action is underway within all levels of government to acquire the line. As is the case throughout most of North America, when the ‘steel disappears, it never reappears’.

CN has placed the line on the abandonment list

Industry has told us rail is a crucial requirement for economic growth in the region.

Formerly owned by Ottawa Central Railway, a division of the former Quebec Railway Corporation, the Beachburg Sub is a vital link to economic growth and commercial viability in both Pontiac and Renfrew Counties.

We need your support to Save the Rail.

It’s time to take action...Save the Rail Line!

 
 

This petition is not enabled

  1. #1 by Harry Gow on September 4, 2009 - 7:33 PM

    It is essential that the federal government provide funding for the rescue of this essential interprovincial rail link!

  2. #2 by Bert Titcomb,P. Eng on September 5, 2009 - 8:44 AM

    A steel wheel rolling on a steel rail is the most efficient way to move people or freight. If Canada is serious about reducing green house , the country must invest in railways now. Canada is falling further and further behind in rail transportation particularly in regard to passenger rail service.

  3. #3 by Terry Findlay on September 13, 2009 - 1:06 PM

    Governments at all levels must do everything humanly possible to promote and support rail transportation as the mode of public commuting
    from small centres to larger destinatations to
    reduce the traffic burdens on congested roads
    and save the environment in general.

  4. #4 by Bernie Geiger on September 13, 2009 - 2:45 PM

    It is important to save these railways and corridors. If we do not today, it will cost us billions to (re-)develop new ones for smooth comfortable, sustainable commuter rail service. Since the Oshawa/Toronto/Hamilton corridor has GO Train service, why does not the Ottawa Valley?

  5. #5 by mahow on September 13, 2009 - 4:36 PM

    Think to the future and save the rails

  6. #6 by mahow on September 13, 2009 - 4:39 PM

    Rail travel is one way to encourage sustainability so let’s act now and help to save the future.

  7. #7 by Rian Manson on September 13, 2009 - 7:23 PM

    We, as a community need to prevent the destruction of our rail infrastructure as it will help serve the present and future commuting needs for the communities between Pembroke and Ottawa.

  8. #8 by Rian Manson on September 13, 2009 - 7:34 PM

    Rian Manson :We, as a community need to prevent the destruction of our rail infrastructure as it will help serve the present and future commuting needs for the communities between Pembroke and Ottawa.

  9. #9 by Chris Holloway on September 13, 2009 - 8:12 PM

    Please save this line. A major part of our economic and social health depends on it.

  10. #10 by Steve Gribbon on September 13, 2009 - 9:17 PM

    The single person 2000 lb steel cocoon {electric, hybrid or otherwise} to commute to a fixed work space is patently unsustainable, requires too much expensive road infrastructure, and worst of all often requires the sacrifice of thousands of acres of arable land to sustain.
    When the time comes that people can’t afford to drive to work the rail system won’t be there for them and nor will the local farms to feed them. Only the foolish believe that we can carry on this same road, and end up in a different place.
    That is why European governments are investing tens of billions in rail infrastructure and providing drivers strong incentives to change over.

  11. #11 by Charles De Jean on September 13, 2009 - 10:20 PM

    It’s time to use proper transit and an enviromentally sound alternative to rubber tired transport.

  12. #12 by Mark Merriman on September 13, 2009 - 10:47 PM

    We must make sure that there is a rail service for this area. Automobiles cannot offer the transportation that will be needed in the future of this area. Rail will be the cheapest way to transport people and this line is perfect for this job.

  13. #13 by J G Hamel on September 14, 2009 - 10:35 AM

    Every efforts must be made to reduce pollution by increasing rail service instead of reducing services.

  14. #14 by Peter R Mills on September 14, 2009 - 4:02 PM

    Rail transportation is an essential part of our infrastructure. Supporting the use a modern rail system supports energy conservation, reduces environmental impacts and promotes safety for the roads by removing more trucks and cars from the roads. Eastern Ontario needs this rail link as a vital part of building a community which promotes better transportation and communication and makes this region a better place to live.

  15. #15 by Donald Guest on September 14, 2009 - 9:14 PM

    I worked for CNR for almost 25 years, and would hate to see the line disappear completly.

  16. #16 by Keith McCann on September 17, 2009 - 8:18 PM

    The city of Ottawa has been sputtering, hiring consultants to plan light rail commuter service, signing contracts for construction, cancelling and paying cancellation penalty payments in the millions!! What a shame!!! When I worked for CPR in the 50’s there was the beautiful Union Station across from the Chateau Laurier (in the heart of the shopping district) and excellent rail passenger service to and from there from every direction. Served by both CP and CN trains operated passenger trains between Ottawa and just about every community within 100 miles of the Capital .
    For example, Waltham, Fort Coulonge, Shawville Quyon, Maniwaki, Blue Sea, Kazabazua, Wakefield, Thurso, Buckingham, Gatineau, Rigaud, St Eugene, Navan, Alexandria, Casselman, Prescott, Kemptville, Manotick, Osgoode, Smiths Falls, Richmond, Pembroke, Renfrew, Arnprior, Almonte, Carleton Place, Stittsville, Kinburn, Carp, Bristol, Norway Bay, Fitzroy, Harbour , Dunrobbin and points in between.
    Then as history has repeated so often, although the Railroads were what opened the country to settlement with towns springing up along the rights of way and businesses thriving with the transportation provided, eventually the railroad was considered a nuisance and too noisy to be near the homes that had been built alongside. Sooo it was decided to relocate them. With reduced ridership the railway companies were forced to cut back service and some idiot decided to move Union Station to the east end of the city where people coming in to shop or commute must take taxis to their destination. Also rail lines into the city were converted to either highways or bus lines subject to gridlock or bicycle or hiking trails.
    Take a look at Montreal, they at least have maintained a lot of their commuter lines and now are reinstating some which had been abandoned but at least the rails are still there.

  17. #17 by Keith McCann on September 17, 2009 - 8:21 PM

    And from what I have seen the old Union Station in Ottawa is seldom if ever used now..

  18. #18 by Raymond Hennion on February 1, 2010 - 2:45 PM

    Renfrew County can not afford to lose this rail line like Killaloe did in the 80’s , we need this line , for the possabilitys are endless for tourisim .

  19. #19 by Doug Herbert on April 29, 2010 - 4:33 PM

    It makes no sense at all to disregard this valuable resource. Investing now by saving and regenerating this rail system, would provide a much quicker return on our investment than having to rebuild something similar in the future. Let’s try doing something to attract business and manufacturing to this corridor for a change, instead of repelling it. Rural rail service can provide the cheapest form of freight transportation which would help attract manufacturing back to the communities. Future commuters could have another option for travel throughout the area, which would help lessen the impact of having all of those extra cars clogging an already full road system. Let’s make a smart decision here before it’s too late!

  20. #20 by susanprior on September 2, 2010 - 8:32 PM

    I am intrigued, are you saving one or several routes that go through the valley?

  21. #21 by Scott Gordon on January 12, 2011 - 4:59 PM

    Once it’s gone, it’s gone forever.

  22. #22 by tim mcgahey on May 22, 2011 - 7:56 PM

    I to am intrigued,keep up the good work

  23. #23 by lewis on June 13, 2011 - 11:16 AM

    Why we should “abandon and lift the rails” is beyond me, when it was the railway that united this country from sea to sea. In this day and age when we’re trying to preserve this country (and the valley), it makes more sense to get trains rolling again. With abandoning the rails, we may as well be abandoning the Ottawa Valley and the Pontiac.
    I say save the rails.

  24. #24 by Mary McHale on August 18, 2011 - 10:04 AM

    Please save the rail lines in the Ottawa Valley area.

    Its was and can be a vital link to the future local economy. This can be the future of light rail for people who want to tour the area without a car and for those who commute west of Pembroke, Renfrew and Allumette Island to Ottawa/Kanata for
    work and no longer want to use cars as the means of transportation because of rising oil costs.
    Maybe focus groups can be arranged with local area Members of Parliament to express the concern
    of the Ottawa Valley.

  25. #25 by Klayton Keller on August 23, 2011 - 8:45 PM

    Rail is a lot better for the environment.

  26. #26 by Michael on September 20, 2011 - 10:09 AM

    Saving the rails makes sense in so many ways. In terms of freight, rail is unrivalled in efficiency in respect to fuel consumption which is a big issue these days. Even though the fuel prices are rising, the rails are disapearing. The question arises – how can TPR justify saving the rail when CN couldn’t? The difference as I see it is local involvement. We need to look at it from a collaboritive viewpoint. TPR has an advantage that CN does not in it’s ability to focus on this particular line only. CN is a huge company, therefore, its focus needs to be divided over thousands of kilometers of tracks. It cannot, unlike TPR, develop a local connection and encourage and spawn local involvement in both freight and passenger transfer. Lets rally behind TPR’s efforts and save the rail!

  27. #27 by Mac Allaire on December 5, 2011 - 11:16 AM

    I dont understand why CP and CN want to abandon these lines.IT is vital to the local economy and therefore should not be removed. I dont understand CP’s point of view CP after closing there line they could have invested in repairs to run trains faster more efficent after all this is not a spur track this is a trancon line that took trains from MTL to VAN daily .I also dont understand why VIA or the ONR dont run trains thru the Ottawa Valley the ONR could run trains to Smiths Falls either whit freight or passenger service to and the same for the line going to Ottawa.It seems both class 1 railways have left us on the side of the tracks and its up to us make a business plan to make sure that any investor whos interested in purchasing these lines or CP or CN that can run trains. IM a conductor for CP and i always beleive in rail service i love my job lets keep trains running in the Ottawa Valley for the future.

  28. #28 by Mac Allaire on December 6, 2011 - 6:00 PM

    No one’s ever tought about contacting Mr Ackman hes the new investor in CP and want’s to shape up things including management.

(will not be published)